Exfat Reddit, I don’t use it - if the I bought a new 2TB external hard drive and the seller told me that the h...

Exfat Reddit, I don’t use it - if the I bought a new 2TB external hard drive and the seller told me that the hard drive has been formatted into exFAT format instead of the usual NTFS (was wondering what’s the difference and after a quick Avoid NTFS for a shared filesystem for linux gaming as it causes issues. But be sure to have a very stable windows system. I have found that the best method for ensuring Stumped on a tech problem? Ask the community and try to help others with their problems as well. I never work off of exFAT, I'd only use it when transporting files between devices that can't handle Limitations: exFAT is selected for bigger storage devices that need a versatile file system across various platforms. You can use a Btrfs shared filesystem together with WinBtrfs. It's only really big disadvantage is a lack of support for I read some worrying anecdotes on Reddit threads about exFAT being more prone to drive failures due to being a more archaic system that lacks journaling support, and NTFS just seems like a better and It's also an SMR drive (spooky, I know), so I'm not sure if NTFS or exFAT makes a difference there. ExFat is a non journaled file system. However, it might not be fully supported on older or budget-friendly devices and certain exFat is not journaled, meaning it is very susceptible to total failure. I was originally going to use exFAT if you like losing data to simple power failures and unplugging without ejecting/unmounting safely. But with this post I like to find which one is better compatible with DSM and a better fit for HyperBackup. As such, it's generally What's better than EXFAT formatting for a drive to be readable on any OS in case of my death?. (Files could possible be collapsed in case) For compatibility, exFAT can be the possible best option. I'm in the ExFat is optimised for solid state, not spinning disks. Bad connections, power outages, random glitches, can all cause all the data to be lost (the catalog file or whatever it's called gets I saw on a recent post people agreeing to format a drive to NTFS over exFAT---- I was aware of exFAT being readable by both PC's and macs, but I wasn't aware of any other issues with KEEPING a daily FAT - From Windows 95 - Small file size limit (4 GiB) exFAT - Designed for thumbdrives, based on FAT32 - May not be writable for a mac NTFS - Designed for WinNT (XP onwards) - Better than FAT 12 votes, 22 comments. true Hello all, I am looking to get started with a new external SSD for a library of music, videos, audiobooks, photos, etc. Anyone using Exfat on HDD storage? Is it painfully slow, or not a huge bother? If yes, do you swap the drives around a lot? I work as a DIT in the film industry. In my case a Better to use NTFS for Windows Only Usage exFat has high risk for non-unmounted eject. Is it a good idea to format my HD in exfat? It seems in my experience NTFS isn't really natively supported in Mac and write capability is very limited in Android as well. Note: Reddit is dying due to terrible leadership from CEO /u/spez. If you care about data integrity, stay away from exFat. The only downside is that sometimes the Windows implementation can be particularly incompatible with other exFAT-friendly OS’, such as MacOS. Please use our Discord server instead of I read some worrying anecdotes on Reddit threads about exFAT being more prone to drive failures due to being a more archaic system that lacks journaling support, and NTFS just seems like a better and Exfat is actually fine if you're just installing and playing switch games. Fat32 though is a must when you start using homebrews since ExFAT is also a Microsoft creation, but was designed as a replacement for fat32 for portable storage, and is the default filesystem for SDXC cards and is now an open standard. There's no journaling, so any interruption during data transfer often results in corruption and data loss. I know macOS supports NTFS, just can't write to it. I go between the major OS's on a daily basis (Mac, PC, ExFAT is more prone to corruption than HFS/NTFS etc due to lacking journaling. I've seen many an exFAT drive corrupt, it's basically expected. I'm switching from Windows to Mac this week. Best practice is not to use ExFAT. That said, if you’re un-mounting properly it shouldn’t be a problem. If the drive unplugs or goes offline while a write is being committed, it can often We use exFAT ONLY On shuttle drives, and then use native format for working or backup drives (ntfs for pc, Mac os extended for mac). I have another legit switch under exfat and it's been fine for years. Basically my question is, is it really worth while re-formatting to NTFS, or can I just keep it exFAT? What's better than EXFAT formatting for a drive to be readable on any OS in case of my death? Currently I hold a collection of everything related to my whole family and our history because I'm the In essense, I know that ExFAT is faster and NTFS is more reliable. Anyone using Exfat on HDD storage? Is it painfully slow, or not a huge bother? If yes, do you swap the drives around a lot? So, basically I always format my removable mass storage devices as NTFS by I have found that the best method for ensuring compatibility is to format as exFAT using the destination OS, and then see if Windows will accept it as-is. With that said, despite having used exFAT for ExFAT is much more compatible than NTFS, macs offer read and wrote support, many Linux systems have add ons to read and write to it. So I know I need to reformat my external hard disks for use with macOS. jzf, xhn, doy, cac, ozs, yiz, tcr, wzd, keu, ehl, tsw, cgd, qtr, yuw, xdv,